Search for: "CIR Law Offices"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
Even though Officer Pearce may have acted in good faith, there is no good faith exception to the exclusionary rule when, as here, an officer makes a stop based on a mistake of law and the defendant is not violating the law. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Law Offices of Sidney Mickel, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:04 pm
In Federal Law Enforcement Officers Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:14 pm
Zuccarini, No. 07-16788 (9th Cir. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
The refusal of a municipality to hire an over 45-year-old job applicant as a law enforcement officer because of statutory age limits governing a state police... [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Law enforcement officers frequently call on prosecutors for advice. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 7:09 am
Cir. 2005). [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:39 pm
Many, perhaps most, law enforcement officers in North Carolina are at will employees. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:48 pm
LEXIS 27607 (11th Cir. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:17 am
Officers who raided a house where there was underage drinking with adults had no qualified immunity on the arrest where one young man was there with his father, and Ohio law clearly exempted that from the law. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
Graham, __ F.3d __, 2015 WL 4637931 (4th Cir. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:23 pm
Any reasonable officer would have known that these actions violated clearly established law. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
Cir. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm
appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Johns, 874 F.2d 1447 (11th Cir. 1989). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:20 pm
Commerce Planet, Inc. (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:20 am
LEXIS 4235 (5th Cir. [read post]
E.D.Pa.: Violation of state law as to officer's jurisdiction for arrest not a Fourth Amendment issue
30 May 2010, 9:05 pm
Defendant’s arrest allegedly in violation of state law as to the officer’s jurisdiction was irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Hawley, 660 Fed.Appx. 702 (10th Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (an officer who was “not formally trained to determine whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs” suspected a driver of being impaired; the officer called for a DRE; another officer arrived and conducted a dog sniff while the first officer was waiting for the DRE to arrive; the opinion notes that a lower court found that because the sniff took place “prior to the… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 1:20 pm
The post Shooting an Officer the Bird appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
